Actually, imagine Dr. Suzuki in a court of law, on trial defending his manifesto requiring Canadians to reduce their carbon emissions which is against Harper Government’s policies on climate change, as it will have a detrimental effect on Canada’s economy in turn.

Excerpt from Dr. Suzuki’s Carbon Manifesto:

Governments and corporations are not just failing us, they are the driving forces that are taking us to the brink, wilfully ignoring the consequences and thereby committing what can only be called an intergenerational crime. The consequences of their actions — and inaction — will reverberate for generations. Wilful blindness is an indictable offence as is criminal negligence, but intergenerational crime is so recent a concept that we have yet to develop the legal mechanisms to act. Our so-called leaders must be held accountable.

This accountability must extend to every citizen of Canada. We have failed our children and our planet because of our fear of change and our fear of the future.

I accuse corporations, including the automobile, energy, pharmaceutical, chemicals, and agricultural sectors; of putting profit and growth before all else including the survival and health of society. That their corporate lobbying is setting our country’s agenda is shameful.

I accuse Canadian politicians of intergenerational crimes. Their actions will affect our grandchildren, and their grandchildren.

I accuse Canadian corporations and government of immoral activity with devastating consequences for the poorest, most vulnerable nations on the globe.

I accuse Canada’s politicians and its citizens of wilful blindness, of failing to be informed about critical issues that they have the power to influence and of failing to take action when they are aware of avoidable ecological crises.

If my country refuses to exonerate me, then it stands guilty of failing to defend its vaunted claim of freedom of speech. If my words are judged treasonous, then so be it.”

This was the scene to which I was a jury member at mock “Trial of Suzuki”

Over the course of 2 hours, The Government and Dr. Suzuki, plus ‘expert’ witnesses had the opportunity to present their respective case and the jury was encourage to make an informed decision on whether to convict Dr. Suzuki.

I have to say I was very impressed with the way the information and facts were presented.

Here is what I gathered:

Government perspective:

1. Canada’s economy is primarily based on Oil & Gas since WWII

2. By levying a carbon tax (per the Manifesto) would cripple Canadians and its economy – not just Alberta, by Ontario and other provinces would see a multipler effect. ie., tax wouldn’t just impact Oil & Gas industry but would conservatively half the value of households. Given households are the primary asset for Canadians, it would affect our life savings and quality of life. With reduction in housing market, people will stop building new, thus adversely affect the construction industry and continue to cascade resulting in increasing in unemployment levels similar or worse that Great Depression.

It will affect Canadians across the board and to what point?

3. Canada’s carbon emissions is only 2% compared to Rest of the World

So the Manifesto advocates destroying Canadians to have no overall impact on climate change.

Now discuss among yourselves… Actually, that’s what we did – struck up a conversation to the stranger next to me and shared our thoughts.

I feel this was the goal of this entire mock trial exercise – get people to discuss climate change as opposed to burying their head in the sand.

Next up was the Defense for Dr. Suzuki

4. Current economic assumptions have not taken into account the impact of climate change related disasters. Toronto, Calgary, NYC flooding, sea levels increasing, extreme temperature fluctuations are a result of 0.85C degree increase. Just imagine the impact when we have a 2C increase as projected if we continue without dramatic effects to reduce carbon concentrations trapped in the atmosphere.

[As I write this, the typhoon in Philippines just hit – 10K feared dead, homeless, infrastructure loss, massive flooding has damaged food crops – climate change has its own multipler effect – at this rate, insurance companies won’t be able to continue to provide coverage]

5. If Canadians accept that they need to change their carbon emitting ways, this will accelerate the budding green economy – providing new industries / skills / jobs.

6. Currently, Oil and Gas industries receive subsidies. Remove those subsidies, introduce a carbon tax based on consumption and use the capital to invest in the Green economy.

One of the experts put it in context. His father was born in a time where it was common to burn wood as primary source of heating till today where we now depend on a mix of energy sources (some that didn’t exist when his father was born) like nuclear and renewable to oil & gas and less coal. We’ve done this kind of dramatic energy shift before, we just need to continue to do so and accelerate progress.

7. So what about Canada’s 2% contribution to carbon emission impact?

Via UN / IPCC reports, its globally recognized that humans need to act to ensure the survival of the human race on the planet – do something to reduce / slow the impact of future climate change.

But all these are non-binding reports – we need simply to start somewhere and the further we delay, the hard it will be to make an impact. eg., if we had started 20 years ago, we’d have to reduce global carbon emissions by 3% annually. If we do it tomorrow, I think its either 6-15% – Net of it, is that we need to start and look at this from a strategic / inter generational perspective.

Climate change will impact all humanity, thus we’re dependent on all nations participating to reduce their respective emissions. What example would Canada provide to developing nations and emission juggernauts like India and China, if so called First World / Developed / Rich country like Canada refuses to lead by example? The Kyoto Protocol was intended to address this but Canada has withdrawn from these efforts (turns out majority of Canadians aren’t aware of this fact)

At the end of the day, this mock trial was effective at getting 2 opposing schools of thought in the same room to present their viewpoints and to allow the masses to decide. We need to continue this conversation, thus the inspiration for this blog post.

As you can see, the issues are complicated. I can see both perspectives and know that some really tough decisions need to be made.

So all I can ask dear reader, is that you:

• Educate yourself on how climate change will affect you and your loved ones.
• Stop ignoring that feeling in your gut that something is wrong
• Try not to get bogged down in details and misinformation intended to promote inaction.
• Recognize that YOU have to act (inaction isn’t an option anymore) -we need to act locally and work together as a global community to address this challenge. (The team @ Organic Lifestyle will work on new posts to help empower you to act)

Remember, you have the power:

• Vote with your wallet – consume / support products that take these issues into account as your budget permits.
• You have a voice, its time to use it – start by discussing climate change conscious decisions with your friends over dinner (esp if you are tired of talking about Rob Ford 🙂
• The power to vote – Vote for political parties that align to your values, both short term and long term.

Thoughts?

The author would like to thank all involved with THE TRIAL OF DAVID SUZUKI, including but not limited to LAURIE BROWN, DONNELLY LAW, CAPE FAREWELL, ROM CONTEMPORARY CULTURE, AS PART OF CARBON 14: CLIMATE IS CULTURE, CAROLINE BIRKS OF PANICARO FOUNDATION, JOHN ST and THE DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION.

Dr. Suzuki’s Manifesto in Full:

I’m David Suzuki. I stand here today as an elder, beyond the temptations of money, fame or power. I have no hidden agenda but to speak the truth.

Human beings and the natural world are often too beautiful for words. I’ve spent much of my career filming the wonders of nature and our place in it – many times words would fail me. As I near the end of my life, I am amazed at how much power, technology, wealth and consumption humanity has acquired, and that has transformed our lives while at the same time undermining the very life support systems on which our existence and well-being depend – air, water, soil and food, photosynthetic activity and biodiversity.

Now, my grandchildren are the joy of my life, but I know how uncertain their future is and all the baubles of our consumer society cannot compensate for the rich wonders and generosity of nature. But you don’t have to be moved by the beauty of the world to understand that we depend on it utterly for our very existence. My postwar generation and the boomers who followed lived like kings and queens as we partied as if there was no tomorrow, never worrying about the kind of world we were leaving for our children. Well, the party’s over.

“Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course… If not checked, many of our current practices put at serious risk the future we wish for human society…No more than one or a few decades remain before the chance to avert the threats we now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity immeasurably diminished… A great change in our stewardship of the earth and the life on it is required if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated.”

Those words are taken from the World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity, from November 1992, over two decades ago. It was signed by over 1,700 senior scientists from 71 countries and included more than half of all Nobel prizewinners.

Since the World Scientists’ Warning, scientific study after scientific study has documented the perilous state of the atmosphere, oceans, forests, vanishing species, toxic pollution and the unanticipated consequences of powerful new technologies.

Now we stand on the edge of a precipice that is of our own making. In less than 100 years, we have managed to lose sight of our absolute dependence on nature, and our responsibility not to foul our own home. We congratulate ourselves for growth, expansion, technological advances, and profits, and we live with the illusion that our inventiveness enables us to keep the economy growing without limit.

Canada has been near the head of the line when it comes to growth and profits in the world. And the tyranny of the belief that the economy is what matters most to the country has transformed us to a point where we can hardly recognize ourselves. George Monbiot writes “Canada: a “liberal, cultured, decent country” has been “transformed into a thuggish petro-state.” I believe this is who we are. A country that in spite of everything science tells us, what the changing weather tells us, is determined to squeeze every bit of oil out of the ground to grab the last of the profits to feed an addiction that we know is destroying a future from coming generations.

Governments and corporations are not just failing us, they are the driving forces that are taking us to the brink, wilfully ignoring the consequences and thereby committing what can only be called an intergenerational crime. The consequences of their actions — and inaction — will reverberate for generations. Wilful blindness is an indictable offence as is criminal negligence, but intergenerational crime is so recent a concept that we have yet to develop the legal mechanisms to act. Our so-called leaders must be held accountable.

This accountability must extend to every citizen of Canada. We have failed our children and our planet because of our fear of change and our fear of the future.

I accuse corporations, including the automobile, energy, pharmaceutical, chemicals, and agricultural sectors; of putting profit and growth before all else including the survival and health of society. That their corporate lobbying is setting our country’s agenda is shameful.

I accuse Canadian politicians of intergenerational crimes. Their actions will affect our grandchildren, and their grandchildren.

I accuse Canadian corporations and government of immoral activity with devastating consequences for the poorest, most vulnerable nations on the globe.

I accuse Canada’s politicians and its citizens of wilful blindness, of failing to be informed about critical issues that they have the power to influence and of failing to take action when they are aware of avoidable ecological crises.

If my country refuses to exonerate me, then it stands guilty of failing to defend its vaunted claim of freedom of speech. If my words are judged treasonous, then so be it.

With my carbon manifesto, I aim to stop these crimes:

1. Fossil fuels as our primary energy source are over. Within a generation they must stay in the ground. That means exploration and subsidies to the fossil fuel industry end now.
2. Save the earth’s largest carbon sinks: Canada’s Boreal forest and our oceans must be protected.
3. Seventy per cent of our energy must be renewable energy within one generation.
4. A carbon tax of $150 per tonne starts now.
5. Canadian climate scientists must be able to share their findings uncensored and unimpeded by political and corporate interests.

I hereby offer a manifesto pledge:

Human beings have become so powerful that we are altering the biological, chemical and physical properties of the planet on a geological scale. We must look to the future, and science rather than politics or economics must be our guide.

I know our dependence on fossil fuels must end.

I know it will take massive change for us as a species to survive let alone thrive in the converging global crisis around climate, food, water, fuel and the economy.

I pledge to stop the epidemic of blame around the climate crisis and recognize my own responsibility.

The way I live my life is part of the problem.

I believe we need a new vision for our future as Canadians and as humans.

I pledge that I am ready to implement change. I want to be part of the solution not part of the problem.

I stand with the Carbon Manifesto. This is our way forward.